🔗 Share this article

Troubling occurrences often unfold in Wes Anderson's films. Within his most recent production, a man is casually split in half during an aircraft crash. In a different celebrated film, the central character pretends a fatal disease to weasel his way into his broken family. In a similar vein, the apparently noble concierge in a further story is in truth a killer, against the backdrop of a imaginary country falling under fascist control.

These situations are presented with witty satirical effect—the animated split mimics a classic cartoon, and the fictional setting is named after a well-known Eastern European liquor. Additionally, each moment is richly decorated with eccentric curios, peculiar attire, and saturated colour. To avid aficionados, this method is recognizable, like finding a minute flaw in an otherwise perfect creation.

Show Highlights

After previous exhibitions dedicated to other renowned auteurs, the latest display turns its attention to Wes Anderson, presenting an expanded version of a exhibition originally presented in collaboration with a renowned film institution. The layout remains familiar to many, featuring a handpicked assortment of archive material arranged by movie. Among the about 700 pieces drawn from a warehouse are outfits, hairpieces, sketches, miniatures, fictional tomes, artwork, a tent, a typing machine, and dozens of stop-motion puppets.

Upper-class elites … outfits from a popular movie showcased.

Spanning a 30-year movie arc, the display starts with the director's first film—a surprising nod to a famous auteur's approach—and concludes with the filmmaker's latest movie, which earned varied receptions. The display layout features rooms painted in multiple shades of red, starting with bold postal and culminating in rich oxblood. Against this intense background, the distinctive quirkiness of Anderson's universe shines.

Highlights for Enthusiasts

Dedicated followers will surely enjoy exploring the display's treasures, including an unbelievably elaborate scale model of a railway seen in one of the features, or the sumptuous velvet garment worn by a renowned actor as a wealthy dowager. Additionally exhibited is the real model of a iconic pastel building, looking like a massive confection, along with miniatures of altered marine life from a different movie, and an assortment of soft stop-motion creatures lined up similar to a suspect lineup.

Marvelous … Mr Fox models his iconic ribbed fabric suit.

Known for his snappy dressing, the auteur allegedly ordered a garment crafted from the exact fabric as one of stop-motion characters, acted by a Hollywood actor. This detail exemplifies the director's considerable influence within the film world. Star-studded casts are a further consistent characteristic in his movies; fans might quickly miss supporting appearances by famous performers. Beyond acting, the filmmaker partners with acclaimed creative professionals, such as a visual artist and an award-winning costume designer.

Attention to Detail

For more casual film lovers, the overwhelming preoccupation on the director's unique style might seem somewhat too much, like being stuck in a boutique filled with overly twee objects. The tone of object obsession is set immediately, as the exhibition opens with a display case filled with matching journal notebooks, every one featuring exceptionally precise writing detailing concepts for each film. This underscores the director's longstanding focus as a minutiae perfectionist.

The overall feeling is one of creative fastidiousness that borders on obsession. Extreme effort is taken in down to the most minor details, for example auditioning left-handed children to attain the authentic style of 1960s handwriting for a fleeting note that appears on screen for just a short time, or using the specific variety of dye used by an infamous criminal syndicate for a body art on a stop-motion creation.

Maybe the ultimate demonstration of this meticulous approach is the use of frame-by-frame filmmaking, which necessitates figures to be moved from 12 to 24 times for every moment of film. An acclaimed film allegedly needed a couple of years to produce, and the artists—who are artists—are required with making the figure seem real.

Thoughtful Perspectives

Not so cosy and rarely {discussed|